• @expatriado
    link
    English
    123 months ago

    updating symbols does not erase history

    • @Whelks_chance
      link
      English
      283 months ago

      It does change the way people think about history though

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      223 months ago

      You’re right.

      Updating symbols does allow for better reflecting a modern understanding of history, though.

      • @expatriado
        link
        English
        5
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        does my comment makes it sound like i am against it? symbols can be whatever they want it to be, it is their nation

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          73 months ago

          does my comment makes it sound like i am against it?

          Not explicitly, though it does read like a comment that could be made by someone who is against changing symbols in recognition of some aspects of history.

    • @UnderpantsWeevil
      link
      English
      123 months ago

      But it might confuse people into thinking the Spanish genocide of native people was a bad thing.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      33 months ago

      Are you trying to argue for honoring Columbus, or just being contrarian to try to sound smart?

      • masterofn001
        link
        fedilink
        English
        10
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        My interpretation:

        History happened.

        That doesn’t change.

        Changing symbols doesn’t change that.

        Columbus doesn’t deserve honour. Nor a place on the coat of arms.

        Columbus was an asshole.

        History still happened.

        Trinidad now chooses who / what they wish to celebrate and honour.

        History is not deleted.

      • @expatriado
        link
        English
        -13 months ago

        neither, you’re overthinking