• @chaogomu
    link
    1723 days ago

    We don’t need an amendment. We just need to get rid of a few openly corrupt supreme court justices.

    Because as has been shown, precedent can be ignored.

    • @lennybird
      link
      English
      11
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      I am writing a several-thousand word paper on this very thing, and the nature of a corrupt court doesn’t get fixed until you put better representatives in the House and Senate, which doesn’t happen until you change the rules of the game for Campaign Finance & Election Law.

      Ultimately, the stacked court is there to stay for decades if not perpetuity until a grassroots demand for a constitutional amendment reforming our elections occurs. This must be a movement as big if not bigger than civil rights in order to happen. But it’s the only way to fix the root problem and also sidestep the Supreme Court.

      Pretty much every single major issue that plagues our country is caused or exacerbated by:

      • The Electoral College
      • FPTP Voting
      • Money = Speech, Dark Money, and Corporate Personhood
      • Gerrymandering
      • @chaogomu
        link
        223 days ago

        Don’t get me started on Ordinal vs Cardinal voting systems… But the TLDR is that Ordinal is great when you have two options, and shit when you have more than that.

        STAR is the best voting system I’ve found so far. (Still looking for better, but STAR is pretty good)

        • @lennybird
          link
          English
          -3
          edit-2
          23 days ago

          Yeah STAR is really promising! I ultimately appreciate anything that 1) isn’t FPTP, 2) Eliminates the Spoiler Effect, and 3) is extremely intuitive to even the most demented grandma and youngest most newest newcomer to voting. I really like Approval Voting because it’s kind of foolproof.

          Like you said, hard to find perfection (eg, condorcet winner meets intuitive), but we also can’t let perfection be the enemy of good.

    • @Stovetop
      link
      323 days ago

      I’ll take the amendment still, one worded strongly enough that a corrupt supreme court can’t argue around it.