• Angry_Autist (he/him)
    link
    English
    -34 months ago

    It’s really sad how even techheads ignore how rapidly LLM coding has come in the last 3 years and what that means in the long run.

    Just look how rapidly voice recognition developed once Google started exploiting all of its users’ voice to text data. There was a point that industry experts stated ‘There will never be a general voice recognition system that is 90%+ across all languages and dialects.’ And google made one within 4 years.

    The natural bounty of a no-salary programmer in a box is too great for this to ever stop being developed, and the people with the money only want more money, and not paying devs is something they’ve wanted since the coding industry literally started.

    Yes its terrible now, but it is also in its infancy, like voice recognition in the late 90s it is a novelty with many hiccoughs. That won’t be the case for long and anyone who confidently thinks it can’t ever happen will be left without recourse when it does.

    But that’s not even the worst part about all of this but I’m not going into black box code because all of you just argue stupid points when I do but just so you know, human programming will be a thing of the past outside of hobbyists and ultra secure systems within 20 years.

    Maybe sooner

    • @CarbonatedPastaSauce
      link
      English
      54 months ago

      Maybe in 20 years. Maybe. But this article is quoting CEOs saying 2 years, which is bullshit.

      I think it’s just as likely that in 20 years they’ll be crying because they scared enough people away from the career that there aren’t enough developers, when the magic GenAI that can write all code still doesn’t exist.

      • Angry_Autist (he/him)
        link
        English
        04 months ago

        yeah 2 years is bullshit but with innovation, 10 years is still reasonable and fucking terrifying.