• @RadicallyBland
    link
    English
    483 months ago

    and if Trump being a FELON And RAPIST isn’t enough to get you to overcome the Democrat bias you were raised with… you are a sad, disgusting person. No, we cannot be friends if you support him. Kamala: I want to support the working class and help people buy homes. Trump: I will immediately punish everyone who has opposed me. The two sides are not the same. Maybe before Trump you could pretend they were. They weren’t… but the GOP kinda pretended they weren’t fascist POSs. Project 2025 just fucking comes out and says it. They want to overthrow democracy.

    • @aidan
      link
      English
      -13 months ago

      The GOP under Trump is more ethical than it was under Bush. Fewer children killed and PATRIOT Acts signed

    • @rottingleaf
      link
      English
      -223 months ago

      They are saying two different things.

      But why would you believe Kamala is radically different is beyond me. It’s lawful evil vs chaotic evil. Yes, with evil you’d prefer lawful.

      • @Snowclone
        link
        English
        213 months ago

        All you’re saying is your entirely ignorant of the political outcomes of the last century, you aren’t smart or enlighten because you think ‘both sides’. If Hillary won we wouldn’t being dealing with a stuffed supreme court as well many other courts all over the country that have blatantly done all they can to give every action of Republicans the appearance of legality. We wouldn’t have lost over 1mil people in a pandemic. We wouldn’t be having courts openly consider resetting our entire legal system to the 1770s including full blown racist laws, we wouldn’t be fighting for our basic rights. The level to which you’re completely wrong is HIGH.

        • @rottingleaf
          link
          English
          -163 months ago

          I don’t think “both sides”. I think they are the same side. That of establishment, or of elites, or of “the rich” if you like that rhetoric.

          We wouldn’t be having courts openly consider resetting our entire legal system to the 1770s including full blown racist laws, we wouldn’t be fighting for our basic rights. The level to which you’re completely wrong is HIGH.

          Yes, threatening you with “authoritarianism or barbarism” is more persuasive if barbarism is real. I’m not saying there’s anything else on the ballot.

          • @redisdead
            link
            English
            43 months ago

            One side: We are rich and hate poor people.

            The other side: We are rich and hate poor people, and also want to kill minorities and the people we think are deviants.

            You: wow, totally the same.

            • @rottingleaf
              link
              English
              -43 months ago

              Since they can’t exist without each other - yes.

              • @redisdead
                link
                English
                13 months ago

                I’m pretty sure the world can exist without Nazis. In fact, it did for a long time. It’s only recent history.

                • @rottingleaf
                  link
                  English
                  -13 months ago

                  I meant that Republicans and Democrats of today can’t exist without each other.

                  Also no, it didn’t.

                  • @redisdead
                    link
                    English
                    23 months ago

                    They absolutely can. You could have democrats party as it is today and then a socialist party. The Republican party does not have to exist at all for Democrat party to exist.