• @draneceusrex
      link
      74 months ago

      If they could be strictly Originalist though, I could almost forgive them. I don’t see a real Originalist argument for Presidential Immunity, as just one example.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        10
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        This is the main issue with so-called originalists. If they dispassionately followed their own philosophy it would be one thing. The law is the law, as written and as intended by its authors. There is a certain undeniable logic to this approach, and I think even if you reject it, it is fundamentally a philosophy that one could respect.

        But orientalists never did this. They have constantly engaged in at least as much “legislating from the bench” as other jurists. It is a rare day when we saw a decision where originalism overcame their right-wing ideology.

        In practice, originalism is just a rhetorical weapon, and not a serious idea.

    • @SkybreakerEngineer
      link
      English
      24 months ago

      Can’t reason someone out of something they didn’t reason themselves into