@colderr to [email protected] • 16 days agoGlub glubimagemessage-square7arrow-up1356arrow-down114cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1342arrow-down1imageGlub glub@colderr to [email protected] • 16 days agomessage-square7cross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@fauxeriouslink62•16 days agoIt means, if they don’t want to hear from you, you ought to respect that
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish24•16 days agoBut they didn’t hear from that person, they heard from a little fishie! How ungrateful…
minus-square@raspberriesareyummylink7•15 days agoThat’s a cuttlefish though, and despite the name is not a fish.
minus-square@raspberriesareyummylink1•13 days agoInteresting read but I’d argue a fish is a concept by characteristics, not considered a biological classification. Much like mammals. Fish: has scales and fins and a swim bladder and gills. Sharks are not easy to classify as fish, and whales certainly are not. Again, thanks for the article, it was interesting to read indeed.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink5•16 days agoIf you know that for sure yes. Phones have block capability too so there’s always that option.
It means, if they don’t want to hear from you, you ought to respect that
But they didn’t hear from that person, they heard from a little fishie! How ungrateful…
That’s a cuttlefish though, and despite the name is not a fish.
There is no such thing as a fish
Interesting read but I’d argue a fish is a concept by characteristics, not considered a biological classification. Much like mammals.
Fish: has scales and fins and a swim bladder and gills. Sharks are not easy to classify as fish, and whales certainly are not.
Again, thanks for the article, it was interesting to read indeed.
If you know that for sure yes. Phones have block capability too so there’s always that option.