• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    112 months ago

    I read that as “incentivizing keeping AI in labs and out of the hands of people who shouldn’t be using it”.

    That said, you’d think they would learn by now from Piracy: once it’s out there, it’s out there. Can’t put it back in the jar.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      302 months ago

      They should be doing the exact opposite and making it incredibly difficult not to open source it. Major platforms open sourcing much of their systems is basically the only good part of the AI space.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        102 months ago

        Also, they used our general knowledge and culture to train the damn things. They should be open sourced for that reason alone. Llms should be seen and treated like libraries, as collections of our common intellect, accessible by everyone.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      142 months ago

      Not open-sourcing it is a terrible idea, it just creates more black boxes and gives corporations a further upper hand.

      • @JustAnotherKay
        link
        English
        -42 months ago

        Yeah what do I care if Jimmy down the street enjoys using his Ollama chatbot? I’m too busy worrying about Terminator panning out