In her first interview as the Democratic presidential nominee, Vice President Kamala Harris told CNN it was imperative to reach a ceasefire deal in Gaza, but made it clear that she would not alter President Joe Biden’s policy in the region.

However, when pressed on whether she would stop sending weapons to Israel she told Bash, “No, we have to get a deal done, Dana. We have to get a deal done.”

“Adopting an arms embargo against Israel’s assault on Gaza is not only a moral imperative but also a strategic move to defeat Trump and MAGA extremism. It is difficult for the Democratic candidate to champion democracy while arming Netanyahu’s authoritarian regime” reads a recent letter to Harris from the coalition Not Another Bomb.

Recent polling has repeatedly demonstrated that Democratic voters overwhelmingly support the conditioning of U.S. military aid. A Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR) survey from March found that 52% of Americans want the U.S. to halt weapons shipments to Israel in order to force a ceasefire. 62% of Biden voters said “The US should stop weapons shipments to Israel until Israel discontinues its attacks on the people of Gaza,” while only 14% disagreed with the statement.

The numbers from a June CBS News poll were even higher, with more than 60% of all voters and almost 80% of Democrats saying the U.S. shouldn’t send Israel weapons.

“The real question should have been, ‘When are you going to start enforcing U.S. law as it relates to arms shipments’ because what we are doing right now, with this United States policy, is in violation of not just international law, but also of American law, “said the Arab Center’s Yousef Munayyer in an interview with Democracy Now in response to the CNN segment. “Vice-President Harris made it clear in other parts of her interview that she wants to be a prosecutor. She wants to enforce the law, but Israel is clearly getting an exception from the Harris campaign.”

    • @riodoro1
      link
      24
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      In history books. This is oligarchy.

    • JaggedRobotPubes
      link
      English
      244 months ago

      80% in terms of people, but not 80% in terms of money.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        80% in terms of what those people say but not 80% in terms of people who are willing act on their stated desires. So really it’s ~80% that don’t care according to their likely actions.

      • @Linkerbaan
        link
        -14 months ago

        Politicians are in the business of selling votes. But votes can only be sold when they are received.

        As long as everyone knows that a vote for Democrat or Republican means your vote is sold to AIPAC.

    • @emax_gomax
      link
      94 months ago

      It sucks we have to vote on people instead of policies.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        44 months ago

        If those “swing” voters care that much about bombing gaza then they’re going to be voting for trump regardless of kamala’s position.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        84 months ago

        They can easily declare AIPAC a foreign lobby group and prevent them spending money in out elections

        They did it to RT. They can do it to Israel. And Saudi Arabia while they’re at it