108cm is squarely within the range of dwarfism so, as a minority, I wouldn’t be surprised if the data the user is searching for is scarce or missing altogether.
Hence the result pictured.
That said, the person searching this could have just made a typo for 180cm, which is much more common.
108cm is squarely within the range of dwarfism so, as a minority, I wouldn’t be surprised if the data the user is searching for is scarce or missing altogether.
Hence the result pictured.
That said, the person searching this could have just made a typo for 180cm, which is much more common.
Why am I analysing the meme? Who knows.
Well overthinking things is generally quite fun, at least until it’s not.