• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -115 days ago

    I do think RCV would be a better system than what we have now, but I have very little confidence that it could ever be implemented without some loopholes that would essentially undermine it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      615 days ago

      Do you think Australia/Ireland have those loopholes too, or is there something else we need to fix first before it’ll work here?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          315 days ago

          And Schulze is even better than that, but we’re never going to get anything better than FPTP if we can’t coordinate on a first step.

          Heck, I feel a little dirty inside calling IRV by “RCV” to appeal to the general public.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            015 days ago

            I do have that concern but based on how RCV has worked in some real elections my concerns with it a major enough that it might be worth it to advocate for a different system. I don’t want electoral reforms as a whole to go down because of imperfections with RCV.

            • @Clinicallydepressedpoochie
              link
              4
              edit-2
              15 days ago

              I mean gotta coalesce around something cause right now debating before the door is even opened is seriously killing momentum.

              Edit: Think back to occupy. People defeating each other before the real battle even starts is a guaranteed way to lose.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -515 days ago

        I’m not familiar with how elections work in those countries, but from what I do hear, Aussie politics is pretty rightwing.