• Echo Dot
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    They have it’s very easy there are free programs that monitor all data traffic.

    This claim that Facebook listens to you on your phone has been around for years. It has been investigated numerous times and has never turned out to be true. Until recently the processing capacity required would have been insane and you would have an incredibly high noise to signal ratio. It’s just not an economical way of gathering data for advertising.

    Why bother anyway when people put their entire lives on Facebook, for free, in easily processable text?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      83 months ago

      Your phone/plan carrier using voice data to make a marketing profile is well documented actually. This data is purchased and verified and resold by meta, or in some cases bought and used by alphabet for GAS. Cacti can show you outgoing data for every device on a network, and you can see data being sent from a phone in signed packets going to your carrier when you’re not “actively using” it. It seems like you know about network monitoring tools but you haven’t actually used them, just talked about them in reference to data collection.

      “Why buy the cow” here is also easily answered: not everyone uses Facebook, a fair number of users will deactivate their facebook page but continue to use messenger.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            03 months ago

            Yeah, with lots of leaked customer data. Nothing about using voice data to make a marketing profile. Unless there is a second leak I don’t know about.

            But judging by your inability to link it you just made it up.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        03 months ago

        So what you’re saying is the biggest companies like Amazon, Google, ChatGPT, etc… can’t perfect voice dictation when I’m talking directly and clearly to my device, but this company has been able to figure it out. And doing it while hiding from the smartphone OS that it’s doing it. While the device is at a distance/hidden in my pocket. And is using it just to sell ads.

        👍

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -13 months ago

              I asked because it was nonsensical and could have been funny if you were imitating the typical internet child comment but here we are with you making no sense and me disappointed

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  Hey! You can’t read after all! Rember when I explicitly posted that you can sniff packets going to your phone provider and not these companies? You have zero reading comprehension and a bad attitude, and it’s obvious you’re more interested in being right than being correct. If googling unrelated drivel articles to a discussion gets you off, you do you I guess

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    03 months ago

                    I’m sorry I proved you wrong to the point you had to resolve yourself to personal attacks. Do you feel better now?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -1
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Because people’s (presumed private) conversations on Messenger are not the same thing as things people post publicly.

      Personally, I would never install that malware on my phone. But if you even have FB Messenger installed on your device, chances are that it’s constantly sending your data to Facebook. Go take a look at what permissions it “needs.”

      • @Warl0k3
        link
        English
        43 months ago

        We can see what it’s sending to facebook though, and it’s not constant. There’s a bunch that it does send and receive, but this isn’t hypothetical speculation, like, we can just see that it’s not using your microphone for that, or sending anything like audio data. You can check this yourself, wireshark is free and packet specifications are available.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I get that, but it just happens far too often to be coincidence.

          I’m not going to claim to know how, but it’s naive to take the word of corporations when we have so much circumstantial evidence that shows these firms are targeting people with ads for things that they had never shown interest in, but happened to mention once in the presence of a device with a microphone and internet connection. There have been people who have tested this, and have gotten results that indicate that this just cannot be a coincidence. It has happened to me personally on several occasions (before I started keeping my mic off at the OS level, hasn’t happened since).

          I’ve been around long enough to know that, just because the general public doesn’t know how some proprietary tech that corporations spend billions on R&D for might work, doesn’t mean it’s impossible. People have come up with insane shit, and that’s just the stuff that people have voluntarily (usually) disclosed. God knows what kind of proprietary shit is out there that we have no awareness of.

          I mean, for fuck sake, you can now steal a person’s password by listening to their keystrokes:

          https://www.tomsguide.com/news/the-sound-your-keystrokes-make-is-enough-for-ai-to-steal-them-how-to-stay-safe

          Not to mention the fact that the NSA likely has back doors in every major piece of software and hardware in the US…

          I know that stuff isn’t directly related, but the point is that these things always seem impossible, until it gets leaked that it’s been possible for years now.