Amazon trying to cover their ass?

Updated Wednesday, September 4, 2024 5:10 p.m. EST - Amazon reached out to deny the reports of a crack down on singing along with the radio in trucks and provided this PR video clip as evidence. A PR spokesperson told Jalopnik: “This post is completely inaccurate. Amazon has never issued guidance or communications to Delivery Service Partners that prohibits singing in the vehicle.”

https://youtu.be/3ddtY_iOrk8

  • @eramseth
    link
    English
    13 months ago

    This isn’t right. Singing also counts as distracted.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        33 months ago

        I, for one, am in favor of volume limits. Too many times ambulances get stuck behind cars whose drivers simply cannot hear the siren.

      • @eramseth
        link
        English
        23 months ago

        Not necessarily, but there’s a difference between something being illegal and something being perceived by an insurance company as increasing risk. There are a lot of things that are legal and risky.

        • MentalEdge
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Insurance wanting employees monitored so they can deny coverage or excuse an increase in premiums is not much of “ok yeah that makes sense”.

          With that logic our own cars are going start monitoring us and have us hand the data over to insurers so they can let you off the hook for the “privacy fee” or whatever as long as you then don’t sing in your own car.

          This isn’t about risk. Its about humans not being allowed to be humans.

          • @eramseth
            link
            English
            13 months ago

            Oh I totally agree and yes we’re already on that path.

            The solution here is probably more like no cameras spying on your employees for every second of their shift. Give them a job and let them do it or not do it.