@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 3 months agoToo many looks.mander.xyzimagemessage-square25fedilinkarrow-up1299arrow-down111
arrow-up1288arrow-down1imageToo many looks.mander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 3 months agomessage-square25fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish5•3 months agoAren’t these changes, because there are just have bones to look at, so skin properties etc are a guessing game? But how did that jaw bone double in length in 2001? Was the skull a missing part until then?
minus-squareGloomylinkfedilinkEnglish2•3 months agohttps://palaeo-electronica.org/content/2023/3821-the-osteology-of-irritator This is the Paper that started it. They used some (at the time) new techniques to 3d model an old fossil they had, if I recall it correctly.
Aren’t these changes, because there are just have bones to look at, so skin properties etc are a guessing game?
But how did that jaw bone double in length in 2001? Was the skull a missing part until then?
https://palaeo-electronica.org/content/2023/3821-the-osteology-of-irritator
This is the Paper that started it. They used some (at the time) new techniques to 3d model an old fossil they had, if I recall it correctly.