• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -43 months ago

    I thought a massive international effort defeated the nazis, including strategic bombing, embargos and lend-lease. Weird.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      5
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      The USSR killed 80-ish percent of the nazi troops, and suffered 26 million casualties, mostly civilians exterminated by the nazis. They were mainly responsible for the victory and suffered the heaviest losses, including a lot of the lower level communist organization whose absence lead to the bureaucratic centralization (that Stalin opposed heavily before his death) that let corruption gradually take over the project.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -43 months ago

        Yeah, when you organize your army based on politics and not on, you know, military capability, you end up sucking at war and need to make it up in numbers. You ignore intelligence of imminent invasion you let hundreds of thousands of troops get encircled and begging the Yankees for resources.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              3
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Why would I need to seriously argue against what is essentially tropes, including the asiatic hordes trope? Your argument speaks for itself.

              Compare the size of the soviet army at the start of the war to the size of the French and German armies. Now compare the Soviet delaying actions to the invasion of France.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  3
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  Remind me how many French and British troops were bypassed and encircled during the invasion of France?

                  Remember that the combined forces in France were much larger and more mechanized than the soviet army during barbarossa, and were invaded by less troops