• Socialist Mormon SatanistOP
      link
      -13
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Yes they are public, and as looking at that proves, I have never even posted to that community.

      And my posting history proves that as well.

      Do you have any proof that I’ve posted to that community?

      As I learned from some of the tech people in the tech sub, it was looked at and there are many people banned from that sub with no explanation. If you can find any posts that I have made to that community, be sure to update me!

      In the meantime, I believe we should focus on discussing the content of the articles posted from here on out, in order to keep with the spirit of this community. Thank you!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        7
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        As I learned from some of the tech people in the tech sub, it was looked at and

        Do you mean the post that was removed for breaking rules? The one that attracted a lot of downvotes and a few people dunking on you for obviously being butthurt about something no one has, or owes, an explanation for?

        there are many people banned from that sub with no explanation.

        Two. It was two people. Lol

        I have noticed that it really gets under your skin that you were banned from an entire instance for toxicity. Maybe you can do the research instead of demanding a stranger find out why an admin in the fediverse took the time to specifically ban you and then write “toxic” as the reason. I don’t get paid by you to do this research but maybe you can send me a few hundred USD to do so? In the meantime, if you don’t want to discuss it, I suggest you not bring the issue up again. Thank you!

        • Socialist Mormon SatanistOP
          link
          -134 months ago

          Do you mean the post that was removed for breaking rules?

          Yep. And the rule I broke was the rule that said “no posts asking for technical help.” Which is my bad because I didn’t read the sidebar before posting.

          The one that attracted a lot of downvotes

          No, the one that attracted upvotes and supporters saying that your screenshot indeed showed no proof of my ever having posted to the sub I was banned from. I’m surprised you don’t remember, because you got into an argument with one of the posters who supported me. Do you remember?

          I have noticed that it really gets under your skin that you were banned from an entire instance for toxicity.

          Under my skin?! hahahaha I was banned from a place I never visited, posted on, or even knew existed. LMAO

          So any samples of posts I made to that place? Funny how there are zero instances of me posting to that place in my comment history. Hmmm…

          But as I’ve mentioned several times, I believe we should focus on discussing the content of the articles posted from here on out, in order to keep with the spirit of this community. Thank you!

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            64 months ago

            Rewriting history is so beneath you! It bothered you so little you made two posts about it and at this point probably 50 comments about it LMAO

            Still waiting on that check. Thank you!!!

            • Socialist Mormon SatanistOP
              link
              -134 months ago

              I don’t know what you mean. You’re still not talking about the content of the article. Let’s stay focused on the content of the article especially since you’ve had some comments removed for personal attacks today. Thank you!

                • Socialist Mormon SatanistOP
                  link
                  -134 months ago

                  I have no idea what you are talking about. Can we just stick to the contents of the article posted so that we can stay within the spirit of this community please? Thank you!