The Cooper Davis Act would force tech companies to report suspected drug activity to the government. Experts say it would be a disaster for digital privacy.

  • @Raphael
    link
    English
    -142 years ago

    Scroll up and find the part where I said to ban encrypted messaging. You’ll find the following sentence instead “spying is bad”.

    • @stanleytweedle
      link
      English
      132 years ago

      You also said

      Necessary evil. Go too far in the human rights narrative and society crumbles.

      in response to

      And is it important enough to encroach on individual rights like privacy and due process?

      • @Raphael
        link
        English
        -10
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Removed by mod

        • @stanleytweedle
          link
          English
          7
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Necessary evil. Go too far in the human rights narrative and society crumbles.

          Can’t expect any smart idea from drug addicts though.

          You’re adorable.

          • @Raphael
            link
            English
            -62 years ago

            Combating drugs is good, spying is not good, you need a very transparent law that tackles the issue in a smart way.

            • @stanleytweedle
              link
              English
              32 years ago

              Combating drugs is good, spying is not good, you need a very transparent law that tackles the issue in a smart way.

              Necessary evil. Go too far in the human rights narrative and society crumbles.

              Keep digging ;)

                • @stanleytweedle
                  link
                  English
                  62 years ago

                  You do seem like someone that wishes they were an autocrat that could just get rid of people they don’t like.

                  • @Raphael
                    link
                    English
                    -62 years ago

                    I believe in true freedom of speech (not the american bastardized version of it).

                    You’d be fine.

                    As long as you were not using drugs.

    • @LemmyNameMyself
      link
      English
      32 years ago

      You didn’t say it, yes. But established survaillance can be countered by encrypted messanging apps, so the next logical step is to ban them. In fact, the US has been trying to do so for a long time now and the same excuse is always given - “think of the children”. There’s a video by Louis Rossmann and another one by Mental Outlaw, both going into detail about why this is just that, an excuse. Survaillance isn’t normal and should not be normalised.

      • @Raphael
        link
        English
        -102 years ago

        America, Smart. Pick one.

        • @LemmyNameMyself
          link
          English
          72 years ago

          Every country has survaillance, US just makes the most noise with laws being passed. It’s the principle that matters - once other countries see that a certain law allows them to monitor people more closely, they’ll want to pass their version of that law. Australia is basically a Police State, UK also has very privacy-invasive laws.

          • @Raphael
            link
            English
            -42 years ago

            Weird, only China gets called out for it by American media.

            • @LemmyNameMyself
              link
              English
              3
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              I mean, no suprise there, every country calls out every other country on that. It’s only OK for the American goverment agencies to spy on Americans.