• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    111 days ago

    I have always had an opinion about it, I just don’t see a reason to bring it up when it is not the point of what I’m saying. That could be a little obnoxious.

    • @Dasus
      link
      English
      011 days ago

      Oh yes, it would just be totally obnoxious to voice an opinion against child genital mutilation, on a FORUM.

      “If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor. If an elephant has its foot on the tail of a mouse, and you say that you are neutral, the mouse will not appreciate your neutrality.”

      ― Desmond Tutu (Foreword)

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        211 days ago

        If it’s on a place where everyone already agrees and it’s not even the point of what I was saying then yes, it can be pretty obnoxious.

        If you are neutral

        I’m not neutral though.

        • @Dasus
          link
          English
          011 days ago

          I’m not neutral though.

          I haven’t taken any moral position on that.

          Okay. Ever heard of the term “avoidance”?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            211 days ago

            You’ve misunderstood. I have a moral position, I haven’t made a moral stance in this thread. Do you get the difference?

            • @Dasus
              link
              English
              011 days ago

              For about a dozen comments, I’ve been banging on about how my point is that my opinion is that there is absolutely no reason not to oppose child genital mutilation — during which you first actively avoided even taking a stance, and now say you always had a stance, but just refrained from telling it out of politeness.

              I’ve seen this a thousand times. Like I said, I knew your nationality before I happened to gaze at the nick. That attitude is exactly what I’ve been protesting the whole time. Protesting, and reiterating that I’m protesting it. Which you’ve not gotten. Despite me pointing this out several times.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                211 days ago

                You’re here protesting someone (who already agrees with you) because I didn’t care to soapbox about my view since the discussion didn’t call for it and we all already agree. This is slacktivism at its finest.

                • @Dasus
                  link
                  English
                  111 days ago

                  You very explicitly stated “I haven’t taken any moral position on that”, but after I point out how weird it would be to not have a position on that, you suddenly always had one, just conveniently adding “in this thread” to the end.

                  You chose to say that you’re actively deciding not to voice an opinion, ie you’re proclaiming a neutral position in the context of this conversation. That is a position.

                  It’s not soapboxing to not be pathologically avoidant of ever having an opinion publicly.

                  The sad part is you honestly don’t even what I’m talking about. I’m yet to figure out what it is about the Finnish language / culture / mentality which breeds this sort of thing. It’s infuriatingly common in Finland.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    111 days ago

                    You’ve misunderstood. I have a moral position, I haven’t made a moral stance in this thread.

                    I already explained it to you in an earlier reply. At this point I’m really not sure what you’re hoping to achieve.