@renzev to Programmer [email protected]English • 9 days agoAI's take on XMLimagemessage-square146arrow-up11.23Karrow-down123cross-posted to: programmerhumor
arrow-up11.21Karrow-down1imageAI's take on XML@renzev to Programmer [email protected]English • 9 days agomessage-square146cross-posted to: programmerhumor
minus-square@Serinuslink18•9 days agoDisagree. I prefer XML for config files where the efficiency of disk size doesn’t matter at all. Layers of XML are much easier to read than layers of Json. Json is generally better where efficiency matters.
Disagree. I prefer XML for config files where the efficiency of disk size doesn’t matter at all. Layers of XML are much easier to read than layers of Json. Json is generally better where efficiency matters.
TOML or bust
yes.
Aren’t most XML parsers faster than JSON parsers anyway?