@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 2 months agoBurning Upmander.xyzimagemessage-square509fedilinkarrow-up11.29Karrow-down1110
arrow-up11.18Karrow-down1imageBurning Upmander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 2 months agomessage-square509fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish143•2 months agoYeah, but it hits different. Smaller number is smaller. That’s why I use Kelvin. THREE HUNDRED AND FIFTEEN DEGREES?!!
minus-square@chiliedogglinkEnglish26•edit-22 months agoShould use Rankine with that logic. It comes out to 566.
minus-squarezitrone 🍋linkfedilinkEnglish6•2 months agoWhy not Centikelvin? THIRTY ONE THOUSAND AND FIVE HUNDRED CENTIKELVIN??!!!
minus-square@NegativeLookBehindlinkEnglish4•2 months agoWho is kelvin and why the fuck are his numbers so large
Yeah, but it hits different. Smaller number is smaller.
That’s why I use Kelvin. THREE HUNDRED AND FIFTEEN DEGREES?!!
Degrees? While using Kelvin?? OP is a phony!
I’d excuse it as part of the joke
Should use Rankine with that logic. It comes out to 566.
Why not Centikelvin?
THIRTY ONE THOUSAND AND FIVE HUNDRED CENTIKELVIN??!!!
Who is kelvin and why the fuck are his numbers so large