• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -725 months ago

    I mean, I’m not sure how well this particular case will prove that point. They are a publisher and they’ve (at least so far) insisted that they will rehire and honour existing contracts. I’m not an expert in the field but I don’t see this hugely impacting any upcoming games’ quality.

    • ivanafterall ☑️
      link
      English
      100
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      “We had to rehire our talented employees to continue making good games” would seemingly make the point very strongly that the workers bring value, not the owner?

        • ivanafterall ☑️
          link
          English
          325 months ago

          Fair point, but it’s kicking the can down the road. Insert “…to continue publishing good games,” “…to continue doing good work,” “…to continue functioning” instead and the argument still works. But you’re right, they’re a publisher, not a developer, that’s my mistake.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            295 months ago

            The workers at the game studios that Annapurna works with, seeing as how they are a publisher not a developer.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              85 months ago

              To be fair - the best publishers I’ve worked with have actively worked to make sure resourcing that’s needed is allocated even if it’s been beyond our means.

          • mozingo
            link
            English
            13
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            They’re a publisher, not a developer. Publishers don’t make games. They sell them.