cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/19744473

I’m going to be building a new computer soon for myself. (Going AMD for the first time, since intel microcode issue.)

I would say I’m an expert or advanced user, as been using pcs for 25 years and set up arch and slackware in the past. I have tried many distros and would like some feedback.

I mainly use my pc for gaming. I want something customizable, KDE ish, and without bloatware. A good wiki is a plus.

I think that i may end up with arch… is it better for gaming since it’s bleeding edge and isn’t steamos built off it?

Side question is distro chooser accurate?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Rolling distro, up to date kernel, very good KDE support, stable?

    OpenSuse Tumbleweed has got you covered.

    Though this weird bloat fetish usually leads to Arch…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      62 months ago

      On the other side: point-release distro, LTS kernel, also very good KDE support, practically unbreakable?

      Debian to the rescue.

      This one won’t lead to Arch.

      • @CrazyslinkzOP
        link
        52 months ago

        Isn’t debian a bit behind on graphic drivers?

        • tisktisk
          link
          fedilink
          12 months ago

          you must have missed the part where OP said he was going AMD this round lool

            • tisktisk
              link
              fedilink
              12 months ago

              it would seem I missed that point entirely bahaha
              fitting username to you sir

          • @CrazyslinkzOP
            link
            22 months ago

            What’s amd have to do with graphics drivers on debian? I’m out of the loop.

            • tisktisk
              link
              fedilink
              22 months ago

              I’m just fanboying for amd and an idiot. please disregard my trolling

              • @CrazyslinkzOP
                link
                22 months ago

                Does amd have better or faster support for drivers then nvidia?

                • tisktisk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  12 months ago

                  ime yes, but only because well…there is no such thing as nvidia driver support

    • @CrazyslinkzOP
      link
      42 months ago

      Understood, not really a fetish, more of I don’t want extra stuff that I don’t want to use or take space for no reason.

      I want to use every drop of my system for performance, maybe that’s from my “old person” in me.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 months ago

        Non-running software doesn’t affect performance as it isn’t anywhere near your RAM or CPU. What often people perceive of bloat is frequently software dependencies that are likely to be used over the course of the OS’s usage.

        Often I have found bloat free setups end up taking hours of digging out dependencies on multiple occasions. Life is too short. I have things to build.

        • @CrazyslinkzOP
          link
          12 months ago

          It still takes space on the drive. It takes an icon on the start menu.

          And then there’s that little devil in me that I don’t want to send feedback back to servers of what I do with my system.

          Maybe I’m paranoid or maybe I just want to squeeze all the pure power (and space) I can. It’s like an old hot rod, there’s no radio; there’s no heated seats; it’s made to go fast and have fun.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 months ago

            It does take space on the hard drive. Can easily remove desktop shortcuts. Telemetry on open source software doesn’t usually happen without consent and you can turn it off (Firefox for example).

            This is more of a feeling type thing. If it makes you feel good though, go ahead.