You really do need to explain yourself if you want to come in here and try to shill for a russian asset. For someone who continually claims to “not be voting for Jill Stein” you certainly seem to be taking every opportunity to post about her. I guess it keeps you off the front lines though.
If you believe any part of the article is inaccurate, I encourage you to reach out to the news organization that published it. If you think the article doesn’t align with the community guidelines, feel free to contact the moderators. Thank you!
I don’t have to explain my actions to you. I didn’t write the article.
If you believe any part of the article is inaccurate, I encourage you to reach out to the news organization that published it. If you think the article doesn’t align with the community guidelines, feel free to contact the moderators. Thank you!
No need to explain yourself to me. But since you’re “not voting for Jill Stein” yet continually post articles about her, it would perhaps be beneficial, not for me but for this community in general, to understand what your motivation is in that regard.
No need to explain yourself to me. But since you’re “not voting for Jill Stein” yet continually post articles about her, it would perhaps be beneficial, not for me but for this community in general, to understand what your motivation is in that regard.
And there we have it. When called out on your behaviour and your fallacy stripped away, your only recourse is to ignore, and repeat the same words. Perhaps you don’t have to and didn’t want to, but you have actually “explained” yourself quite adequately by your responses.
You really do need to explain yourself if you want to come in here and try to shill for a russian asset. For someone who continually claims to “not be voting for Jill Stein” you certainly seem to be taking every opportunity to post about her. I guess it keeps you off the front lines though.
Actually, no. No, I don’t.
If you believe any part of the article is inaccurate, I encourage you to reach out to the news organization that published it. If you think the article doesn’t align with the community guidelines, feel free to contact the moderators. Thank you!
For someone who continually claims to “not be voting for Jill Stein” you certainly seem to be taking every opportunity to post about her.
I don’t have to explain my actions to you. I didn’t write the article.
If you believe any part of the article is inaccurate, I encourage you to reach out to the news organization that published it. If you think the article doesn’t align with the community guidelines, feel free to contact the moderators. Thank you!
No need to explain yourself to me. But since you’re “not voting for Jill Stein” yet continually post articles about her, it would perhaps be beneficial, not for me but for this community in general, to understand what your motivation is in that regard.
I don’t have to explain anything to you.
No need to explain yourself to me. But since you’re “not voting for Jill Stein” yet continually post articles about her, it would perhaps be beneficial, not for me but for this community in general, to understand what your motivation is in that regard.
I don’t have to explain anything to you. Thanks.
And there we have it. When called out on your behaviour and your fallacy stripped away, your only recourse is to ignore, and repeat the same words. Perhaps you don’t have to and didn’t want to, but you have actually “explained” yourself quite adequately by your responses.