@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 5 days agounwatchable!!mander.xyzimagemessage-square104fedilinkarrow-up11.06Karrow-down116
arrow-up11.04Karrow-down1imageunwatchable!!mander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 5 days agomessage-square104fedilink
minus-square@Knock_Knock_Lemmy_InlinkEnglish2•4 days agoThe implication is that the original wasn’t cohesive. I think the real world sections of the original are perfectly cohesive.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•4 days agoI think you got it backwards, I mean the new one doesn’t have cohesion: the parallel stories don’t really match with each other
The implication is that the original wasn’t cohesive.
I think the real world sections of the original are perfectly cohesive.
I think you got it backwards, I mean the new one doesn’t have cohesion: the parallel stories don’t really match with each other