@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 2 months agounwatchable!!mander.xyzimagemessage-square103fedilinkarrow-up11.07Karrow-down116
arrow-up11.05Karrow-down1imageunwatchable!!mander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 2 months agomessage-square103fedilink
minus-square@Knock_Knock_Lemmy_InlinkEnglish2•2 months agoThe implication is that the original wasn’t cohesive. I think the real world sections of the original are perfectly cohesive.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•2 months agoI think you got it backwards, I mean the new one doesn’t have cohesion: the parallel stories don’t really match with each other
The implication is that the original wasn’t cohesive.
I think the real world sections of the original are perfectly cohesive.
I think you got it backwards, I mean the new one doesn’t have cohesion: the parallel stories don’t really match with each other