• @blazera
    link
    English
    -42 months ago

    Yeah, im talking about Nevada too. What should they have done differently, they even went to the secretary of state to make sure they were doing things right. How many frivolous obstacles do you want to put in the way of letting people vote for someone?

    • @just_another_person
      link
      4
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      TLDR: you can’t feign ignorance by actually being stupid because they didn’t read the materials and recognize the form was wrong.

      • @blazera
        link
        English
        -42 months ago

        Jesus christ you get the form straight from the secretary of state and youre gonna call them stupid for thinking its valid? This is obvious sabotage, how can you have no criticism of the secretary, the person in charge of running the election, for handing out bogus forms.

        • @just_another_person
          link
          62 months ago

          As the judge said: they didn’t read the packet, which CLEARLY shows the form, form type, fields noting the form…etc.

          They fucked up.

          • @blazera
            link
            English
            -52 months ago

            Do you have the packet to see? I want to see whats so clear about it being invalid

              • @blazera
                link
                English
                -52 months ago

                Ive only seen articles on the ruling. Link me to the packet please

                  • @blazera
                    link
                    English
                    -52 months ago

                    Yeah, claims need proof. In all caps you’re claiming the packet they received is CLEARLY invalid. I dont think you’ve seen it either to be able to make that claim. That link is just another article on the ruling, not the packet they received.