Socialist Berserker to politics • 4 days agoClaudia De la Cruz slams Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision to kick her off 2024 ballotwww.msn.commessage-square73arrow-up14arrow-down148cross-posted to: [email protected]socialist
arrow-up1-44arrow-down1external-linkClaudia De la Cruz slams Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision to kick her off 2024 ballotwww.msn.comSocialist Berserker to politics • 4 days agomessage-square73cross-posted to: [email protected]socialist
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFartlink3•4 days ago I thought this decision was made by the Pennsylvania state Supreme Court because they didn’t follow that state’s rules for eligibility. Actually this is what I’m arguing. It’s a couple comments up if you’d like to see yourself.
minus-square@blazeralinkEnglish-4•4 days agoYes they did. They jumped through all the hoops and got all the electors they needed.
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFartlink4•edit-24 days agoNot according to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFartlink4•4 days agoI don’t think Russia has a Pennsylvania Supreme Court.
minus-square@blazeralinkEnglish-4•4 days agoA state body regulating elections. it was even a ruling that decided some signatures werent allowed.
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFartlink4•4 days agoCan you try this comment again because I’m not picking up what you’re putting down.
minus-square@blazeralinkEnglish-4•4 days agoThe exact same thing that happened in Pennsylvania. A state body ruling that some signatures werent allowed, so the candidate is barred from participating in the election.
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFartlink3•4 days agoI thought it was in the constitution that the state runs its elections?
Actually this is what I’m arguing.
It’s a couple comments up if you’d like to see yourself.
Yes they did. They jumped through all the hoops and got all the electors they needed.
Not according to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.
Right, same as in Russia. Its obvious BS
I don’t think Russia has a Pennsylvania Supreme Court.
A state body regulating elections. it was even a ruling that decided some signatures werent allowed.
Can you try this comment again because I’m not picking up what you’re putting down.
The exact same thing that happened in Pennsylvania. A state body ruling that some signatures werent allowed, so the candidate is barred from participating in the election.
I thought it was in the constitution that the state runs its elections?