• @dudebro
    link
    11 year ago

    Stuxnet, the joint US and Israel project to exploit multiple zero-days found on Windows to wreak havoc on Iran’s nuclear program.

    You seem to be one of the people who think Israel gets to have nukes but not their enemies. Please admit if this is true or false.

    • @fubo
      link
      0
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      No, I’d prefer that fewer rather than more different parties had nukes, because it’s easier for fewer parties to agree not to use them. Would’ve been nice if the Soviets never got them, too, don’t you agree?

      • @dudebro
        link
        -11 year ago

        Ahh. That’s a real roundabout way of agreeing with what I said.

        Thank you for your shame.

        Anything to admit it’s okay for Israel and the US to work together to exploit windows vulnerabilities, which is how this discussion began.

        • @fubo
          link
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          To be clear, I think it’s a great idea for any humans who are capable of doing so to sabotage the ability of a country that doesn’t currently have nuclear weapons to obtain them. The fewer different parties have nuclear weapons, the less likely it is that there will be more nuclear explosions on this planet.

          It would have been better if Israel didn’t have nuclear weapons.

          It would have been better if the Soviet Union didn’t have nuclear weapons.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            I’ll go way out on a limb here, and say everyone would be better off if literally no one had nukes. Call me crazy, but dying in a nuclear hellfire isn’t exactly how I want to go.

            • @fubo
              link
              21 year ago

              Well, yes, but that’s not really an option today. Non-proliferation is an option today: preventing the list of nuclear-armed powers from getting any longer.