Track_Shovel to Lemmy ShitpostEnglish • 4 months agoStand your groundslrpnk.netimagemessage-square45fedilinkarrow-up1934arrow-down17
arrow-up1927arrow-down1imageStand your groundslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel to Lemmy ShitpostEnglish • 4 months agomessage-square45fedilink
minus-squareFaridlinkfedilink9•4 months agoThey attempted to write “Loiters* will be shot* on sight”.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink11•4 months agoOr “Looters” Or “Lawyers” Or “Losers” Or maybe it really is “L’Otters”. Those radical left rascals causing mayhem and dissection in the workers.
minus-squareFaridlinkfedilink1•4 months agoYes, but we don’t know if that’s what they wanted to write. But in that case, maybe they also wanted to write “shoot” and not “shot”, so yeah, fair point.
minus-squareFaridlinkfedilink2•4 months agoThat’s what they tried to write, but to be lexically correct it should be “loiterers”.
They attempted to write “Loiters* will be shot* on sight”.
Or “Looters” Or “Lawyers” Or “Losers” Or maybe it really is “L’Otters”. Those radical left rascals causing mayhem and dissection in the workers.
Wouldn’t it be loiterers?
Yes, but we don’t know if that’s what they wanted to write. But in that case, maybe they also wanted to write “shoot” and not “shot”, so yeah, fair point.
And wouldn’t it be shooted?
LotRers.
Fans of Lord of the Rings.
What’s a loiter?
That’s what they tried to write, but to be lexically correct it should be “loiterers”.