And why make an entire account to post only negative posts about Wikipedia, and then barely use it?
This is a silly premise. Single-purpose shared accounts are good for security purposes, particularly if you want to expose a problematic organization whose members will stop at nothing to harass, stalk and even doxx you. You might as well argue that the accusers of Andrew Tate should be deanonymized.
Who gives a shit what any idiot on Twitter says?
It’s a place full of literal Nazis, and if you choose that place to have a discussion it’s just because you’re addicted to arguing with trolls.
From her Wikipedia, that’s her full time job for the last decade besides grift campaigns she never stands a chance of winning.
Edit:
And why make an entire account to post only negative posts about Wikipedia, and then barely use it?
What’s going on?
This is a silly premise. Single-purpose shared accounts are good for security purposes, particularly if you want to expose a problematic organization whose members will stop at nothing to harass, stalk and even doxx you. You might as well argue that the accusers of Andrew Tate should be deanonymized.
https://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5417
https://reddit.com/r/wikipediacriticism/wiki/scandals