"Voting for a third party accomplishes one thing. It takes votes away from one of the other major-party candidates. Given that the status quo favors the Republican candidate – think the Electoral College – voting for a third party is probably going to take votes away from Joe Biden. Whatever you think of him, he’s better than the alternative. (The alternative, by the way, likes making jokes about being a dictator.)

Actually, it accomplishes another thing. It enriches presidential candidates for third parties that do not work in cooperation with one of the major parties. (It’s called “fusion voting.”) For instance, the Green Party — these people know they can’t win. They know the status quo prevents them from winning. They don’t say that, though. In the space between what they know and what their supporters don’t know is a scam. In the absence of systemic change, third parties that don’t cooperate with one of the major parties are inherently exploitative."

  • @anticolonialist
    link
    English
    -105 months ago

    If you keep rewarding bad behavior, you’re going to continue to get evil.

    • @Lauchs
      link
      135 months ago

      That’s why we have to vote in primaries for non-evil.

      But we get outvoted, badly, by senior citizens so old time politics reigns supreme.

      • @anticolonialist
        link
        -135 months ago

        This whole purpose of primaries is to keep that evil in power

        • @Lauchs
          link
          75 months ago

          That’s an… interesting opinion.