I have no idea how true this is? It is just a random shower thought.

It may be more true where I am in Canada than in the US? Here, senators are essentially appointed for life. I understand US senators are elected but have longer terms and generally more stable careers than their counterparts? In either case, there seems to be a lot of prestige that comes with the position.

  • slazer2au
    link
    English
    61 day ago

    In the UK the house of Lords is like that but in Australia the upper house has 6 year terms and have to go for reelection. Seats change all the time. Very few are safe seats.

    • @JusticeForPorygon
      link
      21 day ago

      Man the more I hear about how Australia’s government the more I wanna risk the increased chance of skin cancer

      • slazer2au
        link
        English
        123 hours ago

        don’t forget spiders, snakes, sharks, crocodiles. drop bears

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 day ago

      I think the Canadian system is very much modelled after the UK?

      That’s interesting about Australia though. Btw I understand Australia has a ranked voting system in elections? Curious about how well that works. Our first-past-the-post is a nightmare with vote-splitting sending the “wrong” representative to the capital.

      • slazer2au
        link
        English
        -31 day ago

        Ranked choice is first past the post with extra steps.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 day ago

          But doesn’t it resolve the vote-splitting problem? For example, a common scenario here is you have a right-wing candidate winning in a a left-leaning district because the left’s vote is split across more than one political party. Wouldn’t a ranked system solve that dilemma once all the dust has settled?