• @UnderpantsWeevil
    link
    English
    -62 months ago

    The parent company don’t have judicial protections.

    But the subsidiary does.

    • @finitebanjo
      link
      English
      52 months ago

      And the subsidiary has explicit permission to continue operating if the parent company divests.

      • @UnderpantsWeevil
        link
        English
        -62 months ago

        But explicit prohibition on continued operation if they don’t. ByteDance is not affected outside of the US. Only US employees are being threatened.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 months ago

          Only US employees are being threatened.

          Lmao, that’s quite the stretch. The way I see it, US employees AND citizens would be protected from foreign spyware.

          if the XI’s China could stop trying to interfere with the world beyond its border they could also probably stop themselves from being targeted by legislature aimed at protecting citizens of countries outside China.

        • @finitebanjo
          link
          English
          22 months ago

          ByteDance employees chose to work for a Chinese PsyOp parent company who refuses to sell ByteDance. If anything, those employees are suffering because the CCP were given too many rights and protections for owning a business in the USA.

          • @UnderpantsWeevil
            link
            English
            -42 months ago

            So you’re agreeing this is a Bill of Attainder limited to a single group of American citizens?

            Thanks.

            • @finitebanjo
              link
              English
              32 months ago

              The single group of American Citizens are facing no repercussions from the US Government. They’re being thrown under the bus by the Chinese.