• @SchmidtGenetics
    link
    English
    -6
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I mean maybe this is the push they need to actually spend the cash and get one up in space that is away from natural interferences as well?

    Sucks for the home radio Astro guy, but they have the solution, have had for a long time.

    • @9tr6gyp3
      link
      English
      22 months ago

      The best solution is probably to not have starlink satellites up in space tbh

      • @SchmidtGenetics
        link
        English
        0
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Any satellite would provide interference, and the earth naturally has its own, so that’s a non-factor, when the best results can only be had in space.

        Radio astronomy isn’t exactly a home hobbies thing if you didn’t know….

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 months ago

          And radio telescopes aren’t exactly compact enough to build in space. Radio telescope arrays tend to be fields withs dozens-hundreds of dishes several meters across.

        • @9tr6gyp3
          link
          English
          22 months ago

          There is also the fact that the starlink satellites are depleting the ozone layer, in case you haven’t decided we should remove these things yet.

          • @SchmidtGenetics
            link
            English
            -22 months ago

            And? What’s that got to do with radio interfernce?