101 to Microblog MemesEnglish • 21 hours agoStarlink v2 satelites will ruin science.feddit.orgimagemessage-square172fedilinkarrow-up1904arrow-down118file-text
arrow-up1886arrow-down1imageStarlink v2 satelites will ruin science.feddit.org101 to Microblog MemesEnglish • 21 hours agomessage-square172fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@9tr6gyp3linkEnglish1•17 hours agoThe best solution is probably to not have starlink satellites up in space tbh
minus-square@SchmidtGeneticslinkEnglish1•edit-216 hours agoAny satellite would provide interference, and the earth naturally has its own, so that’s a non-factor, when the best results can only be had in space. Radio astronomy isn’t exactly a home hobbies thing if you didn’t know….
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•14 hours agoAnd radio telescopes aren’t exactly compact enough to build in space. Radio telescope arrays tend to be fields withs dozens-hundreds of dishes several meters across.
minus-square@9tr6gyp3linkEnglish1•15 hours agoThere is also the fact that the starlink satellites are depleting the ozone layer, in case you haven’t decided we should remove these things yet.
minus-square@SchmidtGeneticslinkEnglish0•3 hours agoAnd? What’s that got to do with radio interfernce?
The best solution is probably to not have starlink satellites up in space tbh
Any satellite would provide interference, and the earth naturally has its own, so that’s a non-factor, when the best results can only be had in space.
Radio astronomy isn’t exactly a home hobbies thing if you didn’t know….
And radio telescopes aren’t exactly compact enough to build in space. Radio telescope arrays tend to be fields withs dozens-hundreds of dishes several meters across.
You can do the same in space…
There is also the fact that the starlink satellites are depleting the ozone layer, in case you haven’t decided we should remove these things yet.
And? What’s that got to do with radio interfernce?