101 to Microblog MemesEnglish • 2 months agoStarlink v2 satelites will ruin science.feddit.orgimagemessage-square274fedilinkarrow-up11.25Karrow-down133file-text
arrow-up11.22Karrow-down1imageStarlink v2 satelites will ruin science.feddit.org101 to Microblog MemesEnglish • 2 months agomessage-square274fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@9tr6gyp3linkEnglish2•2 months agoThe best solution is probably to not have starlink satellites up in space tbh
minus-square@SchmidtGeneticslinkEnglish0•edit-22 months agoAny satellite would provide interference, and the earth naturally has its own, so that’s a non-factor, when the best results can only be had in space. Radio astronomy isn’t exactly a home hobbies thing if you didn’t know….
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•2 months agoAnd radio telescopes aren’t exactly compact enough to build in space. Radio telescope arrays tend to be fields withs dozens-hundreds of dishes several meters across.
minus-square@9tr6gyp3linkEnglish2•2 months agoThere is also the fact that the starlink satellites are depleting the ozone layer, in case you haven’t decided we should remove these things yet.
minus-square@SchmidtGeneticslinkEnglish-2•2 months agoAnd? What’s that got to do with radio interfernce?
The best solution is probably to not have starlink satellites up in space tbh
Any satellite would provide interference, and the earth naturally has its own, so that’s a non-factor, when the best results can only be had in space.
Radio astronomy isn’t exactly a home hobbies thing if you didn’t know….
And radio telescopes aren’t exactly compact enough to build in space. Radio telescope arrays tend to be fields withs dozens-hundreds of dishes several meters across.
You can do the same in space…
There is also the fact that the starlink satellites are depleting the ozone layer, in case you haven’t decided we should remove these things yet.
And? What’s that got to do with radio interfernce?