• @AusatKeyboardPremi
    link
    203 months ago

    He uses a version of Emacs called MicroEmacs.

    I recall seeing his MicroEmacs configuration a while back when I was exploring options to start using Emacs.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      43 months ago

      MicroEmacs

      In testing, to settle a bet by a rabid cult-of-vi peer, I opened a given set of files in each editor, each a day apart because I couldn’t be arsed to clear caches. This guy, otherwise a prince, was railing about emacs, but otherwise suffered days of waiting.

      10/10 the memory usage by his precious vi was same-or-more than emacs.

      There’s so many shared libs pulled in by the shell that all the fuddy doomsaying about bloat is now just noise.

      I avoid vi because even in 1992 it was crusty and wrong-headed. 30 years on the hard-headed cult and the app haven’t changed.

      I don’t see how microEmacs can improve on what we have by default, and I worry that the more niche the product is the harder it will be to find answers online. But I’m willing to be swayed if anyone can pitch its virtues.

      • @chonglibloodsport
        link
        63 months ago

        MicroEmacs was written in 1985 and has nothing to do with GNU Emacs (which people just call Emacs these days). It’s entirely outside of the vi-vs-emacs war.

        • @steeznson
          link
          33 months ago

          Yeah the interface for it - and functionality - is more like nano than actual Emacs.