• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    78 hours ago

    I agree with your House argument, but I strongly believe that the design of the Senate was a major fuck-up. Senators are far more powerful than representatives, and I get none. A single house member cannot torpedo legislation the way a Senator can. North Dakota (population 780k) gets two. The 4.7M people in Harris County get none. That is a poor design.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      37 hours ago

      and I get none

      Only if you’re not an American or live in DC

      (population 780k) gets two. The 4.7M people in Harris County get none. That is a poor design

      Again the people in Harris county get 2 senators as their state senators represent them. And, again, senators do not represent based on population as that is the job of the house

      Senators are far more powerful than representatives

      Entirely irrelevant as they represent different things. Your representatives represent a portion of your population while your senators represent your state as a whole. The entire point of separating the state and population representation is to allow more perspectives when legislating: the house gives a perspective from closer to the people, the senate from a broader view

      Again, it seems you fundamentally don’t understand the split between house and Senate, why it exists and what it does to our governing system

      • Pennomi
        link
        English
        56 hours ago

        It’s obvious why the Senate exists historically, and it’s also obvious that it’s inherently undemocratic.

        • @MonkRome
          link
          English
          46 hours ago

          I mean historically it existed mostly because states had much more autonomy and power, much like a city state or country. Until at least Lincoln that part of the system had a good logic to it. If they only went off of proportional representation they could basically ignore small states needs. In order to get states to agree to join the union, they had to build a country that would give all states a serious seat at the table.

          The main reason people on the left hate it so much now is that it currently hurts us, but it’s very much an equity vs equality argument. The system was set up to be equitable even if it isn’t equal. Something the left typically supports and this meme touches on. I think the higher priority fix is the house, as it no longer even does what it was designed to do.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16 hours ago

          it’s inherently undemocratic

          It’s exhausting trying to discuss shit online with people with such a terrible understanding of the topic at hand

          Senators are voted for and represent their entire state. They’re the representatives of the state’s general populace in a representative democracy

          • Pennomi
            link
            English
            06 hours ago

            One human = one vote

            Anything else is undemocratic and I think it’s morally reprehensible to support a system that values any one person above another for any reason.