• Cethin
    link
    fedilink
    English
    30
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Honestly astronomy from space is notoriously difficult, for various reasons.

    • It takes a lot of energy and infrastructure to propel a telescope into space.
    • Radiation can cause issues with electronics, so they all need to be hardened.
    • Typically satellites use older proven technology to make sure that they don’t run into new issues, which means they’re not able to be bleeding edge.
    • New technology is next to impossible to add to a space telescope, meaning upgrades rarely happen, if ever. Ground telescopes can continuously upgrade with relative ease.

    There’s a lot of pros and cons. Neither solution is better than the other. They’re only better at certain things. We need both.

    • @WoodScientist
      link
      English
      32 months ago

      The seemingly straightforward solution is that SpaceX needs to be legally required to get into the radio astronomy business. As part of being allowed to launch such noisy satellites. If they are going to wreck radio astronomy on Earth’s surface, they should have to launch orbital radio telescopes of such quality and quantity that SpaceX is actually a vast net boon on radio astronomy. This should simply be a legally required cost of doing business if they want to launch so many noisy satellites. Yes, these orbital telescopes would have a finite lifespan and need to be regularly replaced to be updated, but thankfully the greatest rocket company on Earth will be legally required to launch them regularly.

      • Cethin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 months ago

        That could potentially help, but only to nations/groups that they give the data to. Other groups would still be getting fucked.

        • @WoodScientist
          link
          English
          32 months ago

          It’s scientific data, and considering the context, the rightful property of all mankind. Give it universally to any an all.