“These attacks violate the human right to life, absent any indication that the victims posed an imminent lethal threat to anyone else at the time.”

  • @FlowVoid
    link
    English
    0
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    they have open warrants

    No, there are no open warrants against Israel.

    ICC prosecutors have requested arrest warrants against Netanyahu and Gallant based on war crimes in Palestine (which is an ICC member). But ICC courts haven’t issued warrants yet, and it may never happen. If it did, it would not restrict Israelis in general. It would just mean that Netanyahu and Gallant could not visit ICC states.

    At no point has the ICC ever entered a non-ICC country to drag anyone in, in fact they are explicitly forbidden from doing so. Some other country could take it upon themselves to declare war on Israel and try to capture and extradite him. Spoiler alert: that’s never going to happen, because it isn’t worth it. Whether you like it or not, countries prioritize respect for sovereignty over prosecuting war crimes.

    The only people who can drag in Netanyahu are Israelis themselves. That’s why when anyone asks

    what are we actually going to do about it this time

    the answer is always “we are going to do nothing”.

    Just ask Joseph Kony, who is still free despite an ICC warrant issued in 2006. Or Ahmed Haroun. Or Omar al-Bashir. All are wanted for war crimes, yet nobody can be bothered to bring them in.

    • @Madison420
      link
      04 hours ago

      Sure, just ignore Israel bitchng about it 7 hours ago.

      20 may, the application is what matters, not the issuance. Similarly it doesn’t matter if they are arrested, just that they could be and actively run from it.

      https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/world/2024/sep/20/no-10-fears-icc-ask-uk-sign-benjamin-netanyahu-arrest-warrant

      And yet the issuance and application prevent them from entering like 80+ countries and notably almost all of those with the highest gdp.

      • @FlowVoid
        link
        English
        0
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Well, he is still free to visit the top two countries by GDP. Millions of people spend their entire lives in one or the other. I think he’ll manage.

        But yes, to anyone asking “What are we going to do about this?”, the answer is “We are going to wait until Netanyahu (or Gallant) visits a country under ICC jurisdiction”.

        • @Madison420
          link
          03 hours ago

          Icc doesn’t really hold court often if ever whst they do do is remove people from public participation and lucrative trade deals. Those matter to countries.

          • @FlowVoid
            link
            English
            0
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            An indictment against Netanyahu doesn’t really affect Israel’s trade deals. Israel’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Minister of the Economy, etc are free to go where they need to conclude any deals.

            And most of Netanyahu’s foreign trips before indictment were to the US and Russia, which he is still free to visit. He also frequently visits Jordan, which is an ICC member but in the past has refused to arrest visitors with ICC warrants.

            • @Madison420
              link
              157 minutes ago

              It already has, turkey stopped trade.

              Yes that’s why I specifically didn’t say all icc member states…

              • @FlowVoid
                link
                English
                122 minutes ago

                Turkey’s embargo is not related to the ICC, in fact it happened before the ICC acted against Netanyahu.