Maven (famous) to Science [email protected]English • 10 hours agoSquare!lemmy.zipimagemessage-square75fedilinkarrow-up1699arrow-down122
arrow-up1677arrow-down1imageSquare!lemmy.zipMaven (famous) to Science [email protected]English • 10 hours agomessage-square75fedilink
minus-square@angrystegolinkEnglish7•4 hours agoThis one is enclosed and contiguous though, the lines of the triangle end where the circular line starts. (The rest is just a drafting residue.)
minus-square@finitebanjolinkEnglish-5•4 hours agoNo, it is 2 contiguous regions. The line of separation is the bounding line of a “shape.” Otherwise, the entire whitespace outside of the region is also part of the shape, as is anything it touches.
minus-square@Threeme2189linkEnglish1•3 hours agoOK, imagine the space outside of the shape is black, or see through or whatever.
minus-square@finitebanjolinkEnglish-1•3 hours agoWell then the line of separation means nothing and then you’ve lost a right angle to the contiguous void.
minus-square@Threeme2189linkEnglish1•3 hours agoWhy? Does a cube floating in the void not have angles?
minus-square@finitebanjolinkEnglish-1•2 hours agoWithout a distinction of where the cube begins or ends it does not because there is no cube and there are no angles.
This one is enclosed and contiguous though, the lines of the triangle end where the circular line starts. (The rest is just a drafting residue.)
No, it is 2 contiguous regions. The line of separation is the bounding line of a “shape.”
Otherwise, the entire whitespace outside of the region is also part of the shape, as is anything it touches.
OK, imagine the space outside of the shape is black, or see through or whatever.
Well then the line of separation means nothing and then you’ve lost a right angle to the contiguous void.
Why? Does a cube floating in the void not have angles?
Without a distinction of where the cube begins or ends it does not because there is no cube and there are no angles.
I hope for you that you’re high.