@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 8 hours agoWe lost Keanumander.xyzimagemessage-square74fedilinkarrow-up1189arrow-down14
arrow-up1185arrow-down1imageWe lost Keanumander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 8 hours agomessage-square74fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish20•7 hours agoYes but he didn’t say reverse nepotism he said reverse nepobaby as it wasn’t the parent getting the child a job but the other way round. It’s still nepotism but nepobaby is a more specific term.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-8•edit-27 hours agoMy man corrected it. Now it says “reverse nepotism baby”
Yes but he didn’t say reverse nepotism he said reverse nepobaby as it wasn’t the parent getting the child a job but the other way round. It’s still nepotism but nepobaby is a more specific term.
My man corrected it. Now it says “reverse nepotism baby”
It was never edited lol.