• Encrypt-Keeper
    link
    English
    218 hours ago

    2 devices that can’t function independently. That would make it functionally one device. You’re just splitting hairs now.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -3
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      2 devices

      Glad we settled that one.

      You’re just splitting hairs now.

      My guy, you’re the one splitting hairs.

      • Encrypt-Keeper
        link
        English
        1
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        No, lol. “Multi-device” does not just mean “multiple devices can be involved”. It means “Multiple devices can operate independently”

        And you know that. But you’re splitting hairs to try and fit this use case into something it’s not.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -1
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          No, lol. “Multi-device” does not just mean “multiple devices can be involved”.

          My guy… “multiple” = >1. “Device” = some sort of electronic. It’s that simple. And you know that. But you’re splitting hairs to try and win an internet argument and misrepresent something you don’t like.

          • Encrypt-Keeper
            link
            English
            15 hours ago

            Yes linguistically that’s what the those two words mean.

            But in the context of a messaging app, “Multi device” becomes one singular term with a set meaning agreed upon by everybody but you, that you’re trying desperately to change by deconstructing the words it’s composed of in order to misrepresent something that you evidently like a whole lot.