• FuglyDuck
    link
    English
    193 months ago

    You shouldn’t trust Plaid either.

    Especially if all they’re doing is looking for the routing and account number. Because that’s just as easy to give.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      173 months ago

      I know someone who works in software security at Plaid. I can’t give too many details because there’s only like 20 of them - but no, you REALLY should not trust Plaid. (Allegedly) phones intercepting 2FA in their server rooms, (allegedly) bank connection issues that have led to people getting access to the wrong accounts, (allegedly) using browser bots to handle login on the backend for banks without API access, (allegedly) customer info leaks that weren’t reported… Now that I think if it, I should tell my friend about the whistleblower programs

      • Echo Dot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 months ago

        I don’t know how it works in the US but under European law if he knows about these things and isn’t reporting them he’s liable if and when it all comes to light.

        If you know that the company you work for is committing crimes, and you do not report it, you are as liable as the company.

    • Chozo
      link
      fedilink
      63 months ago

      It’s also risky to give. Banks will generally approve all transactions between two accounts if one of them is a business account, because the assumption is that those are business transactions and are legitimate 99.99% of the time, so there’s very little scrutiny involved for those transfers. Giving the merchant your routing/account number gives them access to make withdraws from your account at will and at any time and can’t be revoked, and giving that access to somebody you may not fully trust the reputation of is a dangerous move.

      A trusted financial institution as a middleman can be useful for those situations, because they’ll tokenize your details to expose as little as possible to the merchant, directly. These services are typically insured, so even if something did happen to your account, you’re more likely to get your money back than if you gave a merchant direct ACH access to your bank account. It’s basically a modernized version of Western Union.

      • FuglyDuck
        link
        English
        93 months ago

        You do realize that if the bank authorizes a transfer, that you did not… it’s wire fraud and they’re obligated to refund that cash, regardless if they recoup the cash or not.

        Their fuck up, their loss.

        On the other hand, if you give your credentials to a 3rd party, that’s against the ToS none of us actually read, and if something happens to your account; they’re going to deem it as your fuck up.

        As for whatever technobabble Plaid wants to use, even if they’re insured… you’re not, unless you can prove in court that they were the source of the breach. Their lawyers are probably better than yours.

        • Chozo
          link
          fedilink
          13 months ago

          You do realize that if the bank authorizes a transfer, that you did not… it’s wire fraud and they’re obligated to refund that cash, regardless if they recoup the cash or not.

          You do realize that not every transaction happens in countries where these protections exist, right? Not everybody can rely on something like the FDIC to protect their funds.

          On the other hand, if you give your credentials to a 3rd party, that’s against the ToS none of us actually read, and if something happens to your account; they’re going to deem it as your fuck up.

          You’re not providing your bank credentials directly to the third-party, either. They use OAuth-like systems to log you in, typically. I’m not familiar with Ozow, specifically, but from what I can tell about their company, they appear to be doing mostly the same things as Plaid.

          • FuglyDuck
            link
            English
            53 months ago

            You’re not providing your bank credentials directly to the third-party, either. They use OAuth-like systems to log you in, typically. I’m not familiar with Ozow, specifically, but from what I can tell about their company, they appear to be doing mostly the same things as Plaid.

            Plaid or Ozow is the third party. You’re using their system, which they control, to provide your credentials.

            You’re trusting that a) they’re not malicious and b) they have their shit together and c) even though they do have their shit together someone doesn’t find a random exploit anyhow.

            As for the first. yeah. that’s a problem. At that point it really doesn’t matter, does it? why would you trust Ozow or anyone else in that sort of environment with your banking credentials? or even the bank with your money?

            • Chozo
              link
              fedilink
              23 months ago

              You’re trusting that a) they’re not malicious and b) they have their shit together and c) even though they do have their shit together someone doesn’t find a random exploit anyhow.

              You could say this about literally any solution short of hand-delivering cash in person.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23 months ago

      Plaid effectively admitted to stealing your transaction history and selling it to the highest bidder in the past. There was a settlement and they agreed to not to that in the future

      Just don’t ever share your password, and certainly not your banking password, and definitely not with Plaid.