• @just_another_person
    link
    02 months ago

    But that entire idea is foolish. If this is now turning into a race-based election, and you’re not voting for Harris against the obvious worst possible candidate just because she has a Jewish husband, then WTF.

    You’re trying to make the case there is some racism here against Palestinians or Muslims, but it’s only okay if it works in reverse against Harris. That’s some extra fucked up logic right there.

    Not only that, if this particular group would rather vote for the guy who has consistently denigrated them, threatened them, called them terrorists, said he’s going to “send them back to where they came from”, and THEN turn around and say it’s valid they do so because they’re trying to make the case that it’s simply about illustrating a point (a threatening one at that)…WOW. That’s is some A+ bullshit and mental gymnastics.

    “Nice little country you got here. Would be a shame if something happened to it, unless you do exactly as I say.”

    On principle I think it a MUST that if you’re suggesting this is the message, straight up tell those people to go fuck themselves, because they are not only harming themselves, they’re harming millions of others.

    • abff08f4813c
      link
      fedilink
      01 month ago

      But that entire idea is foolish. If this is now turning into a race-based election, and you’re not voting for Harris against the obvious worst possible candidate just because she has a Jewish husband, then WTF.

      I would agree, but I don’t think anyone is saying that. Mostly it seems like the message is meant to be “do better on Gaza and (the State of) Palestine and you’ll have our votes”. This is a much more reasonable stance to take - “you’ll have my vote if you fulfill X”.

      You’re trying to make the case there is some racism here against Palestinians or Muslims,

      I make no such case. (I’m not necessarily denying that racism exists, mind, just that this wasn’t the case I was trying to make in this thread.)

      but it’s only okay if it works in reverse against Harris.

      I DEFINITELY do not make this case. If anything, I want to figure out how to bridge the gap so they vote Harris.

      Not only that, if this particular group would rather vote for the guy who has consistently denigrated them

      Have you read the article? It’s Stein vs Harris. The guy is trailing at some pathetic 9%. (I figure those are probably the folks who need new eyeglasses and checked the wrong box on the poll tbh.)

      “Nice little country you got here. Would be a shame if something happened to it, unless you do exactly as I say.”
      On principle I think it a MUST that if you’re suggesting this is the message,

      Read the article. I didn’t suggest this message, this is the one that they are giving (or trying to give) to Harris.

      straight up tell those people to go fuck themselves, because they are not only harming themselves, they’re harming millions of others.

      Normally a protest vote of this nature is not such a big deal. With the stakes of the current election being seen as a threat to democracy itself, suddenly protest votes are not acceptable.

      This is exactly why Uncommitted essentially said, in their refusal to endorse Harris, that a) people should still go out and vote, b) not vote for the GOP, but also, and importantly: c) not vote for third parties or independent.

      That said, if I or you give these folks this message, you think they’d be happy to hear it? After all, Uncommitted already said this to them, in a much more polite way (probably the most possible under the circumstances.) Give them this rude message, and most likely they’d double down.

      If we’re really serious about getting these votes, we’d have to meet them halfway somehow.

      Of course, Harris has stated that she supports a two-state solution and that a ceasefire is needed. It’s not like she’s not trying to meet them - it’s just she’s caught between a rock and a hard place here.

      That’s some extra fucked up logic right there.
      WOW. That’s is some A+ bullshit and mental gymnastics.

      Yes, I would agree - your misinterpreted view of the logic is very much that.