• @mholiv
    link
    24
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    We don’t need to start from Hobbes to understand that, as a society, punishing dangerous drivers is a good thing.

    There is a lot of good reading out there. I recommend this as a starting point when coming to an understanding of violence and society.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leviathan_(Hobbes_book)

    • @Stovetop
      link
      English
      21
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      We don’t need to start from Hobbes

      Recommends Hobbes as a starting point

      I agree 100% but just had a bit of a giggle

      • @mholiv
        link
        72 months ago

        lol. I realized that as I was writing that. But I went with it. Hobbes is a great starting point for people new to political philosophy.

        We just don’t need to start with him.

        I think John Rawls is a better starting place if we were to start a society from scratch. Just a bit harder for people less used to reading philosophical works.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      32 months ago

      Sure, but if simply keeping the roads safe was their only objective, they wouldn’t have things like quotas where they have to shake down a certain number of people for the sake of their budget.

      • @Maggoty
        link
        22 months ago

        That depends a lot on the quota system. If they’re easily achievable then it’s not going to incentivize bad stops. If you have a county that gets four cars a day and the quota is four cars then there’s a problem. Generally it’s a useful way to make sure your police aren’t sitting at the donut shop while they should be working. Like most policies its problems lie in the extremes.