• Dojan
    link
    English
    341 year ago

    I didn’t even read that far but that sums up my thoughts. If she takes issues with LGBTQ+ people as an officiant, then what’s to say it doesn’t when she presides over a court case?

    Like I don’t think any self-respecting couple would want to force an unwilling officiant to wed them, for such an occasion you’d want someone there that wants to do it, right? But her unwillingness to wed people really isn’t the problem here.

    • effingjoe
      link
      fedilink
      191 year ago

      I think if someone is getting a judge to officiate a wedding, they’re not doing it in a ceremony, but in a perfunctory way, at the courthouse. They literally just want to make the union legal. Which it is, even in Texas, so this judge has no standing to refuse.

      I thought this already came up when that woman in Kentucky refused to sign marriage licenses for gay people, and it was ruled that while she didn’t have to personally sign it, if she refused it was up to her to find someone to do it instead of her.

      • Dojan
        link
        31 year ago

        That’s fair, but even in such a scenario I wouldn’t want to deal with someone so openly hostile towards me, just because I’m a connoisseur of dick.

        • effingjoe
          link
          fedilink
          81 year ago

          I’m not gay, nor have I ever been discriminated against for something inherent to who I am as a person, so maybe I lack the perspective to even work it out hypothetically.

          Either way, I agree with everyone pointing out that her inability to do her job without bias in this aspect definitely calls into question her ability to do it in the aspect of judging cases. And “calls into question” isn’t really harsh enough-- it’s proof positive that she can’t be unbiased in a job that requires it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      I don’t think any self-respecting couple would want to force an unwilling officiant to wed them

      If the only people who can perform weddings are clergy and elected officials, they can make it so there isn’t anyone to perform same-sex weddings

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Which is what republican terrorists are hoping for when they pass these bills. They want to “activate” conservative christian extremists so that they deny services as a group.

        Edit: pass bills, interpret laws