• @PugJesusOP
    link
    English
    1410 hours ago

    It may be better to say “Abolish prison as a first-line treatment for criminality”, but that’s less catchy.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      610 hours ago

      Yeah, but that’s the rub, we still need clear communication.

      A slogan is only as good as how little work you need to do fleshing out any possible points of confusion or misunderstanding.

      • @PugJesusOP
        link
        English
        510 hours ago

        Yeah, that’s why ‘defund the police’ floundered so hard.

        On Lemmy, though, for all its other faults, I think the general population is left-wing enough to get it without needing extended clarification.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          89 hours ago

          But that’s the exact danger, if we don’t craft our propaganda and rallying calls to suit the audience who aren’t in the lingo loop that we’re in, then we’re never going to break out of the insulated community to reach coalition partners in actually implementing the change we need

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -28 hours ago

            The right has no trouble getting support with “remigtation” and “mass deportation” I’m tired of trying to woo liberals. I’m happy to be extreme in an effort to shift the overton window

            • @Feathercrown
              link
              English
              28 hours ago

              I admire your will to shift the overton window, but right wing phrases don’t have to make sense, so we kind of have a different bar to clear here

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              18 hours ago

              You just raised two examples of the right expressing exactly what they want to do to defend using terrible slogans that don’t actually convey what is really intended as policy.

              Other people being better communicators than you does not justify intentionally continuing to be a bad communicator, especially when you’re trying to oppose them being a better communicator with bad faith intentions.