• @Passerby6497
    link
    English
    113 hours ago

    Again, why would the government waste real money doing that with fake money, when they can do it with real money instead? What benefit is there, over just being a regular processor for real money? Because it’s definitely not the inability to reverse transactions in blockchain systems, that’s more of a feature for criminals.

      • @Passerby6497
        link
        English
        33 hours ago

        Actually, that is a decent point in this idea’s favor. Don’t think that’ll overcome the downsides, but I’ll give you a point for that one all the same.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13 hours ago

      if the government was to do their own crypto it could do a lot to disrupt the current unregulated “stablecoins” that currently exist, i could see it happing if for no other reason than to fight money laundering. If the fed is doing it, it becomes “real” money and most people would probably prefer a fed coin to something like usdt.

    • @paf0OP
      link
      -13 hours ago

      It would be real money if the federal reserve issued it. Cash still exists, is that a feature for criminals or does it benefit the poor and unbanked?

      • @Passerby6497
        link
        English
        33 hours ago

        It would be real money if the federal reserve issued it.

        No, as you said, its a stable coin backed by real money.

        Cash still exists, is that a feature for criminals or does it benefit the poor and unbanked?

        Cash transactions can easily be reversed, unlike blockchain, but nice bait.

      • @Passerby6497
        link
        English
        53 hours ago

        What benefit is there, over just being a regular processor for real money?

        Online payments, which is a lot of transactions.

        Pretty sure the current system of real money already handles that one friend.