@YoBuckStopsHere to politics English • 1 year agoTexas judge says Supreme Court ruling means she doesn’t have to officiate same-sex weddingswww.lgbtqnation.comexternal-linkmessage-square36arrow-up1191arrow-down17
arrow-up1184arrow-down1external-linkTexas judge says Supreme Court ruling means she doesn’t have to officiate same-sex weddingswww.lgbtqnation.com@YoBuckStopsHere to politics English • 1 year agomessage-square36
minus-square@ThatGirlKylielinkEnglish5•1 year agoWould this mean that any case she has presided over in the past that involved an lgbtq+ person could be thrown out now for prejudice?
minus-square@buddhaboundlinkEnglish2•1 year agoIf I were gay and had been in her court for as much as a traffic ticket, I’d be petitioning to get it thrown out.
Would this mean that any case she has presided over in the past that involved an lgbtq+ person could be thrown out now for prejudice?
If I were gay and had been in her court for as much as a traffic ticket, I’d be petitioning to get it thrown out.