• @bi_tux
    link
    11 day ago

    no, it’s not something good, look at Honkong, Tibet, Russia, Iran, Belarus, etc.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      01 day ago

      Are you advocating for multiple, competing armed groups in the US?

      Generally, a monopoly on the legitimate use of force is considered a cornerstone of “government”.

      • @bi_tux
        link
        116 hours ago

        I don’t like the government, I’m an anarcho-syndicalist. that means different syndicates would be armed and they’d probably be competing, so yeah, I’m advocating for multiple armed forces

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          18 hours ago

          Cool. That’s a coherent political philosophy, you just don’t normally run into people arguing for more legitimate use of violence.

          Personally, multiple armed entities sounds like the worst aspects of government without the redeeming aspects.

          I’m the breed of anarchist more concerned with involuntary power hierarchy than specific forms of said dynamic, like class. Reducing the number of groups who can coerce others into doing stuff isn’t aligned with more legitimate armed factions.
          I voted for my sherrif, so I’m more okay with him pointing a gun a me than your trade union, whom I didn’t vote for. It’s not wholly voluntary because I didn’t get to vote for “disarm the sheriff and make the fire fighters the principle law enforcement group”, so it’s far from perfect, but at least I know who’s holding the gun.