• @BrianTheeBiscuiteer
    link
    -23 hours ago

    Always love seeing the trope:

    *writes awful code*

    See! This is why this language sucks!

    • Ephera
      link
      fedilink
      32 hours ago

      How would you make it non-awful, without specifying static types?

      I guess, a unit test would catch it, but needing 100% test coverage to catch typos isn’t exactly great…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12 hours ago

      What’s awful about this example? The only thing I do is access an object member. Does your code not do that??

      • @BrianTheeBiscuiteer
        link
        1
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        What’s the purpose of foo? Why an ambiguous single character variable? What if the property was there but the value was null? Why not use (assuming JS) optional chaining?

        I’d approach it more like this:

        function getWhatevrProp(userData) (
          const default = { whatevr: "n/a" };
        
          return { ...default, ...userData }.whatevr;
        }
        

        Sorry, read too fast the first time. It’s more likely Python. I also don’t know Python well enough to give recommendations on that.