@cm0002 to Lemmy Shitpost • 1 day agoIt's coming! :(imagemessage-square132arrow-up1849arrow-down172cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1777arrow-down1imageIt's coming! :(@cm0002 to Lemmy Shitpost • 1 day agomessage-square132cross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink26•16 hours agoThere will be no improvement with browsers until the introduction of one with a strong copyleft license.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink12•edit-213 hours agoI’m curious, how would copyleft license improve the quality of browser development? That is really about funding and management.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink9•14 hours agoDon’t Firefox and Chromium already have that?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•1 hour agoChromium is fully entrenched. “strong copyleft”? Even Microsoft bent to the will of Chromium. And Firefox is just a silly thing where people like me hang on
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•8 minutes agoIf I remember correctly it’s under a copy left license which makes sense given it’s ultimately a derivative of KHTML.
There will be no improvement with browsers until the introduction of one with a strong copyleft license.
I’m curious, how would copyleft license improve the quality of browser development? That is really about funding and management.
doesn’t gpl exist? its quite strong.
Don’t Firefox and Chromium already have that?
Chromium is fully entrenched. “strong copyleft”? Even Microsoft bent to the will of Chromium. And Firefox is just a silly thing where people like me hang on
If I remember correctly it’s under a copy left license which makes sense given it’s ultimately a derivative of KHTML.